That’s a Wrap for Spring 2024!
It’s a wrap for Spring 2024! In this post, we briefly review some of the topics we’ve covered this semester and thank our readers and partners for their engagement.
It’s a wrap for Spring 2024! In this post, we briefly review some of the topics we’ve covered this semester and thank our readers and partners for their engagement.
Since 2022, CSU’s Workload Equity Task Force has been collaborating with partners from across campus to identify, implement, and sustain more equitable workplace practices.
What can a cruise ship teach us about onboarding new faculty? In this post, we unpack ways that we can learn others and integrate best practices in how we welcoming faculty to CSU in ways that promote a sense of belonging.
Research has documented how non-promotable tasks, or service work that makes the university function but does little for a faculty member’s career, is often unevenly distributed among faculty, leading to significant inequities. In this post, we talk about the challenges of non-promotable tasks and steps departments can take to ensure equity and fairness in non-promotable task distribution.
When unwritten rules pop up in the promotion and tenure process, they create challenges for early career faculty and exacerbate inequities. This blog post breaks down some of the ways that unwritten rules manifest in promotion and tenure and provides concrete recommendations for addressing unwritten rules.
Part II of our series of P&T discusses concrete steps that P&T chairs and committees can take to address bias in the process and promote equity.
For the next two weeks, Elevating Equity will feature a series of blog posts highlight important insights on the promotion and tenure process at CSU.
Discussions of faculty success and student success are deeply intertwined, and equity challenges are present in both at CSU.
In the second part of our series of equity in interdisciplinary program evaluation, we explore the role of cross-disciplinary approaches and faculty engagement.
In part one of a two-part series, two seasoned evaluators discuss opportunities and best practices for centering equity in interdisciplinary evaluation.